 |
|
Dear Karen,
$885 Billion
and
Sustainable Prosperity
Think of a coin. It seems to have a paradoxical nature to it: two sides, either heads or tails--or it can be viewed as a circle, 360 degrees. What
if we were to look at the economic situation, not from heads or tails, but from the circle perspective--a perspective that has no sides?
The tenor of the economic discussion is "get me out of here." The economic situation is a mess--we don't like it and we want out. Apparently we are to believe
the situation is like a coin; it only has two sides: heads = tax cuts or tails = massive spending.
One
day Alice came to a fork in the road and saw a Cheshire cat in a tree.
"Which road do I take?" she asked. "Where do you want to go?" was his
response. "I don't know," Alice answered. "Then," said the cat, "it
doesn't matter."
~Lewis Carroll
The Cheshire cat has a point. If as each side would argue, heads or tails will take us out of the
situation, we still have a problem. We don't know where we are going.
We want Sustainable Prosperity. We want the roller coaster of boom and
bust to end. While some postulate the roller coaster is inevitable, a
characteristic of the beast called capitalism; I believe that is faulty thinking; which needs to change. I
further believe the "heads or tails" conversation, layered on top of,
"just get me out of here" thinking circumvents our path to Sustainable
Prosperity.
I'll play devil's advocate to both "sides" of the current conversation.
I'd like to demonstrate the essence of the coin: a circle--no sides. And eventually the plan needs to come full circle, making progress in the short term while taking us to Sustainable Prosperity.
Like all complicated stories, it is best to start at the beginning.
Once upon a time, the line between gaming and investing was crossed, and crossed and
crossed--again and
again and again. Until there was so much bad debit in so many places no one trusts anyone anymore.
"People in the financial industry make hundreds of millions doing this sort of thing [that
is, repackaging bad debt as financial instruments] but
it doesn't work in an international economic crisis of this scale." ~Paul Krugman, 2008 Nobel Laureate in
Economics
George Washington, First President of the United States, said both:
"To contract new debts is not the way to pay old ones."
"Gaming is the child of avarice, the brother of iniquity and the father of mischief."
In the $885 billion bailout, there are two philosophical forces at work:
"Heads" is the exaltation of profit, also known as the "free market
theory." This means money is made and held by institutions that are
self-interested and self-perpetuating. It's their nature. The
institution is not bad or wrong--no more than a fish is
bad for being a
fish. The
institutions have claimed an unchallenged sovereignty over the creation
of wealth. The institutions believe that without them we would all
perish.
Free market theory says the market will always fix itself. If the Federal Government uses interest rates correctly, and taxes correctly it can
assist the correction with supply and demand of money. But, above all else, do not invade the sovereignty of the financial institutions with
oversight and regulation.
"Tails" is massive government spending. When institutions behave
badly, the government can do what the institutions should be
doing--creating
employment and wealth. Based on a target level of Gross Domestic
Product (GDP), the economy--supplied with enough cash--can
reach the desired GDP.
Reaching this target GDP is a backwards bread crumb trail from
employment, which will get folks buying and grease the wheels of
commerce.
|
|
Heads, you lose. Tails, you lose.
Here is the first problem with the dichotomy: the government wants
employment while institutions want profit. They do not share the same
core value. Accordingly, the vicious layoffs rippling through our hemisphere further
illustrate the main priority of the institutions--profit, not
employment! It
should be noted that employment is the wealth creation strategy of an individual.
Institutional sovereignty says banks know best what information to
share--or not share. Lack of disclosure is seen as necessary, lest
there be a run
on the bank. Apparently having lost money is okay, but telling folks
you have done so isn't okay. This sovereignty also maintains that if things
are
going
really well (i.e. profits are out the wazoo), then how the money is made doesn't really matter. Even gambling with other people's money isn't
a
problem--as long as
there is profit. A mere eight weeks ago the CEO of one of the largest banks was gleefully claiming that they didn't need the
bailout money--but
"had to take it" to protect everyone from knowing which banks were in trouble. Today, apparently they need over 30 billion to
stave-off the bad debt they have disclosed.
The current devaluation of the investments already made in the banking institutions is near
50% due to undisclosed losses at the time the institutions received the money.
The reverence for the sovereignty of the institutions has made our regulations gelatinous--easy to go around, over, and through.
The second problem is with government spending: there is no
reliable accounting system to see if the spending is working. GDP--the basis of
the spending in and of itself--is a red herring. No assurance or data exists
that concludes a GDP of a certain number will actually mean "jobs" for
those needing them. Additionally, as the bill stands now, so "porked-up" it does not address creating jobs, thus turning the unemployed to employed
so they can spend. Certain parts of the plan, like extension of unemployment benefits are necessary lifelines, but they do not take us out of the
problem.
Additionally, the GDP is out of sync with real time. You can call your
bank and see how much money you have today. But what about those checks
not
cashed and the bills you have not paid? While you have the ability to
adjust for these factors in real time, the GDP does not.
The third problem is the field of economics. In economics the ability to do
controlled studies is lacking: economics can not conduct the kind of scientific studies to test a
theory
will give us a "cure". We have no data other than the past, and it is
hard to filter out or quantify data to assure we know our theories are
actually
any good in practice!
The $885 billion requested by President Obama is based on the
calculation of desired GDP and a theory, known as Keynesian economics,
by a man named
John Maynard Keynes.
Here is the scant data on Keynesian economics:
*FDR spent only after WWII was over (think current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan) at the
level Keynes
wanted
*It took 30 years for the spending to actually "work"
*Keynesian economics was escorted out the door in the 1970's because it has no strategy
for inflation. Many economists postulate the spending had much to do with inflation--and despite the spending unemployment continued!
We are all
experiencing free market capitalist theory now; so it would be somewhat redundant to review it--except, that is to underscore the ethics aspect of
the theory. Smith, who outlined the theory, said, "with out ethics there is no free market." Duh. Like I said, it seems obvious now.
So to review: Neither heads or tails thinking has demonstrated progress
towards Sustainable Prosperity. As we can observe these
theories in
action, both theories create cycles of boom and bust. The theories are problematic and incomplete.
Oh wait! Maybe it is a circle.
So imagine you are in the doctor's office. The doctor tells you that
you have a horrific illness. The illness is rare, so
there isn't
much information about it--especially about how to cure it. The doctor says he only knows two choices, neither of which seems to work really well. But
he says that you need to do something--fast and not just because the
situation is dire, but because your confidence will wane and wane as the
circumstance drags on and this will also have dire negative effect upon you.
Now I ask you: would you flip the coin to pick a choice? I didn't think
so. You would find another option. And frankly at this point, your
mind
knows it is in trouble and would rather die trying something that COULD
work rather than something that will likely not work.
We need a different choice(s). We need sustainable choices--sustainable
prosperity. We can take the path of deep inquiry, thoughtful
conversation and a sense of reverence for what we are about to embark
upon. We do have the brain power. There are countless individuals and
educational institutions that can help:
Stanford University, University of California-Berkeley, Harvard,University Of Wisconsin-Madison, MIT, Northwestern University,
Cornell University, University of Michigan, University of Chicago,Yale University, California Institute of Technology, Wharton at U of P ...
There are over 100 quality educational institutions waiting--on call.
Who has been called on for offer solutions? The same people who believe
in heads or tails and that our only choice is to flip a coin!(Lest anyone think I am not being supportive of the President: I am one of his biggest
fans. That doesn't mean I am a "yes woman.")
My sense is a combination of some highly targeted spending by the government, and
ardent oversight of the institutions, accompanied with full disclosure
and
full write-off of the bad debt (with tax payers needing to be partners
and get paid first) will move us through the short term.
We will only survive the long term if we are willing to put everything on the table for debate--every piece of pork, every entitlement, every
regulation we don't have, and most importantly, every thought about "getting out of here" and focus on our desired destination--sustainable
prosperity.
|
The Audacity of Hope
Our hope is our audacity. No matter how confused we are, cowering under
the bedcovers is not an option. You are not required to have an answer
today
about heads or tails--especially if you are sure the conversation is too small. Be audacious. Be hopeful. Say "NO!" to the sides of the coin and be
certain a coin is more a circle than anything else. Demand better from the conversation. Your children deserve it.
You get the picture. Standing at the cross roads of heads-tails or the
circle, anything is possible. The question is: "What is probable?"
You decide. Pick up your phone, your pen, your bullhorn and take
action. Call, write, and email your Congressperson, Senator, or President.
They can do
better. Or you can just wait, trusting your fate to one of two paths
already laid out. Like Alice, you'll get out--but to where?
|
|
Global to Individual: only thing different is the form
I have spoken much about the global situation this month. For those of
you at a crossroads in your personal life, your path to clarity is the
same.
Put everything out on the table for re-consideration and evaluation.
Realize it is your mortal mind that is part of the problem. We all need
bigger
thoughts now. It isn't heads or tails for you either.
Just like the country needs to establish alignment between the values
is professes and how it invests its money, so too does the individual.
Our essence, our nature, our inner-being knows what is right for us. We
just need to move beyond the noise and listen. If you are interested in
working deeply with money on the individual level, I have workbooks,
tools, tele-seminars to assist individuals. Some of the resources are
free--including the
audio vault which you can access by clicking here.
As always, feel free to email me with questions and comments.
News Flash! 30 days to a miracle with your money!
I am excited to announce you can pre-order my new workbook: Thirty Day Money Master Mind Make-Over by clicking here.
Here's what folks are saying about the Thirty Day Money Master Mind
Make-Over:
"Dr. Monroy I am blown away. I did my 'peace amounts' and I can't beleive what I hadn't
see before. I feel like a
weight has been lifted from me. Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!" --S.L., Mendham, NJ
"You have this uncanny ability to know what my mind is thinking that will trip me up. I am
seeing so much now
and all I can say is 'WOW!'" J.O., Bernardsville, NJ
"My husband and I used to fight all the time about money. Since doing the 30 days,
we have not had one fight!
Such a blessing! Thank you." L.L., Basking Ridge, NJ
"I feel like for the first time in my life at 45, I have a sense of peace about my life and the
role of money
in my life. Awesome book, Karen!" S.H., Los Gatos, CA.
"Karen, Your Thirty Day Money Master Mind Make-over has
been a great insight. It has really helped me to view my money issues
differently & the relation to the ego mind uncanny. Thank You. Your tone and voice is with me
daily and I am appreciative for that." W.T.,Bernardsville, NJ
Upcoming Events
February 25th, 2009 (7PM EST)
"OPEN MICROPHONE"
Once a month as an act of service I host a free tele-seminar to help folks with their
questions and concerns. Please click here to register, and you will be prompted to ask your three most pressing
questions. Per requests, this will be
an evening call! Additionally, because of the potential personal nature of the questions, I will NOT be
recording the call as usual. I look forward to talking with you!
(Editor's note: Wow!! What a great opportunity to have Karen address individual
issues!I'm not going to miss this one!)
For other events on Dr. Monroy's schedule, visit her website! Click here.
If you are interested in viewing some of Dr. Monroy's photos from the inauguration, please
click here!
|
Dr. Monroy
teaches Sustainable Prosperity and is a pioneer in the field of
nuroeconomics
and behavioral economics. Sustainable Prosperity allows us to move
through life with ease and grace. We achieve Sustainable Prosperity by
Expanding
our Money IQ to include:
1. Hard Money Skills (financing, credit, taxes, and investments)
2. Emotional Money Skills (our learned, conscious and unconscious thinking and feelings
around money)
3. Spiritual Money Skills (working with the essence of who we are, our purpose in life and
the energy of money)
Dr. Monroy is also the author of Expanding Your Money IQ: Emotional and Spiritual
Intelligence for Earth School, the Companion workbook: Thirty Day Money Master Mind Makeover and a children's book: Mommy, What is
Rich?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|